Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Kirtley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1884No. 11,173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From tbe Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Complaint in four paragraphs by appellee *486against appellant. Issues were joined and submitted to the ' court for trial. There was a finding and judgment for appellee. Appellant assigns as errors that the court below erred in its conclusions of law upon the facts specially found, and in overruling his motion for a new trial.

The clerk has copied into the transcript what purports to be the special finding of facts and conclusions of law thereon. But it does not appear that the special finding was requested-by either party. It is not signed by the judge who tried the case, or set out in a bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Button v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Board of Commissioners v. FertichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Ferris v. UdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Adams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Service v. GambrelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API