Legal Opinion

Irgens v. Mobil Oil Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1989No. Civ. 880278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Tom and Judy Irgens appealed from an order granting a new trial to Mobil Oil Corporation on both liability and damages for failure to properly complete an oil well. Mobil cross-appealed from an order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm.

In December 1984, Mobil drilled an oil and gas well, known as the Johnson well, on Irgens’ property in the NWVi of Section 27-156-100, a part of the East Fork Field near Williston. 1 The well went down to a depth of about 9,400 feet. Initially, Mobil completed the well by simultaneously perforating two separate zones in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cook v. StenslieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gleson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wilson v. General Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Grenz v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Linrud v. LinrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Smith v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mike Golden, Inc. v. Tenneco Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API