Legal Opinion

Quinn Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, the referee and the board all found that the claimant was not entitled to benefits because of willful misconduct in violation of the provisions of §402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(e), when he was discharged from his position as a taxicab driver because he was involved in two accidents within a period of three years and four months of employment.

There is no dispute as to the facts, which are as follows: The claimant was employed as a taxicab driver *154on March 9, 1959 and was discharged on July 7, 1962.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Shirley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Israel v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. Loder v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Horace W. Longacre, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Hambridge Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Karpe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API