Legal Opinion

Freudenberg v. E Trade Financial Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 11, 2010No. 07 Civ. 8538PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants E*TRADE Financial Corporation (“E’*TRADE” or the “Company”), CEO Mitchell H. Caplan (“Caplan”), CFO Robert J. Simmons (“Simmons”) and Capital Markets Division (“EGAM”) President Dennis E. Webb (“Webb”) (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the “Complaint”) 1 pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 995 (the “PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-4 et seq.…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund v. Apollo Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Wachovia Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. In re Lululemon Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Glaser v. The9, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API