Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 21, 2006No. 04-1371PublishedCited by 546 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Title I of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA) provides that “[n]o covered class action” based on state law and alleging “a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security” “may be maintained in any State or Federal court by any private party.” § 101(b), 112 Stat. 3230 (codified at 15 U. S. C. § 78bb(f)(l)(A)). In this case the Second Circuit held that SLUSA only pre-empts state-law class-action claims brought by plaintiffs who have a private remedy under federal law. 395 F. 3d 25 (2005). A few months…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by546 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

541 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API