Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Philip Morris, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1997No. 71605PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’Donnell, Judge.
Carl Harmon appeals from an order of the common pleas court granting the motion of Philip Morris, Inc. and four of its employees to compel arbitration on his claims for wrongful discharge from employment, breach of contract, defamation and racial discrimination.
The record in the case reveals that in December 1994, Philip Morris distributed to its employees copies of an employee handbook and a brochure describing a Sales Dispute Resolution Program, which included pamphlets explaining the dispute resolution and benefits programs. The Dispute Resolution Program, by its own…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brads v. First Baptist ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by34 opinions
- LILLIAN PEBBLES MORRISON v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., MARK F. SHANKLE, SR. v. PEP BOYS — MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Shumaker v. Saks, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Vanyo v. Clear Channel WorldwideOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Angelina Jackson v. Higher Education Loan Authority of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ambulatory Care Review Services v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.