Legal Opinion
Shumaker v. Saks, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2005No. 86098PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christine T. McMonagle, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellee, Roger L. Shumaker, as administrator of the estate of Delma Caputo, filed suit against defendants-appellants, Saks, Inc., d.b.a. Saks Fifth Avenue and Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc., and Shirley Novak, alleging that appellants had violated Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act.
{¶ 2} In his complaint, Shumaker alleged that beginning in 1998 and continuing through December 2003, Novak visited Caputo as a personal shopper to sell her goods and services from Saks. The meetings typically occurred once a month and would invariably result in Caputo…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Maestle v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Harmon v. Philip Morris, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Caskey v. Sanford-Brown CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Brownlee v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Seyfried v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hedeen v. Autos Direct Online, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Olah v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-16-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.