Legal Opinion
Charter Tp. of Oshtemo v. American Cyanamid Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided May 3, 1995No. 1:92:CV:843PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Joint Defense Group’s motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Order issued August 19, 1993. 1 On that date, this Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (“section 107”).
The claim concerns response costs incurred by plaintiffs relating to releases of hazardous substances at the West KL Avenue Landfill. Plaintiffs, and other potentially responsible parties, had resolved their liability to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borough of Sayreville v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Alliedsignal, Inc. v. Amcast International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Ninth Avenue Remedial Group v. Allis Chalmers Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Sea Lion, Inc. v. Wall Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Adhesives Research Inc. v. American Inks & Coatings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.