United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal demands that we clarify the relationship between cost recovery actions and contribution actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (1987), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), Pub.L. No. 99-499, § 101 et seq., 100 Stat. 1613 (1986). Having completed our task, we affirm the district court’s entry of summary judgment terminating appellants’ action as time-barred.
I. BACKGROUND
The essential facts are not in dispute. In 1981, after discovering…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.