Legal Opinion
Borough of Sayreville v. Union Carbide Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 10, 1996No. Civil Action 94-5674 (AJL)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs the Borough of Sayreville (“Sayreville”), Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”), Rhone-Poulene, Inc. (“Rhone-Poulenc”) and Ruetgers-Nease Corporation (“Ruetgers-Nease”) (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) against defendant United States Department of Defense (the “Government”) and numerous other defendants (collectively the “Co-Defendants”) seeking cost recovery, contribution and declaratory relief for the cleanup of environmental contamination under Federal and state statutory and common law including the Comprehensive…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- SC Holdings, Inc. v. A.A.A. Realty Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Adami v. Cardo Windows, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.