Legal Opinion

Family Division Trial Lawyers of the Superior court-d.c., Inc. v. H. Carl Moultrie, Chief Judge, D.C. Superior Court

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 6, 1984No. 83-1016PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALD, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant-appellees on the basis that the appellants failed to state a valid constitutional claim of involuntary servitude, a “taking” of property, or a denial of equal protection.1 The appellants — three individual attorneys who regularly request assignment of cases in the Family Division of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for which the District pays attorney fees and an association of lawyers who practice before the Family Division — challenged the practices by which the superior…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Roth, Pamela v. King, RufusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. JMM Corp. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API