Legal Opinion
Roth, Pamela v. King, Rufus
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 9, 2006No. 05-7060PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS.
EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
In the 2002 Appropriations Act for the District of Columbia, a joint congressional committee issued a statement “strongly urg[ing] the D.C. Superior Court to evaluate the quality of the legal services rendered by lawyers appointed under the Criminal Justice Act to handle juvenile delinquency cases.” 147 Cong. Rec. H8926 (daily ed. Dec. 5, 2001). The court was “urged to take immediate, affirmative steps to ensure that lawyers who lack the requisite training, experience and skill are not appointed to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Davis v. Tarrant County, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Eva Moore v. John UrquhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Churchill v. University of Colorado at BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Thomas v. WilkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.