Legal Opinion

Radermacher v. Sutphen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1939No. 6720PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J. —

The cause out of which this application for alternative writ of mandamus arises, Radermacher v. Radermacher, will be found reported in 59 Ida. 716, 87 Pac. (2d) 461,, and may be referred to for a full understanding of the issues presented.

In Radermacher v. Radermacher, supra, the decree entered was modified, a petition for rehearing was filed, a rehearing granted and an opinion on rehearing was written in which the following language was used:

“The original opinion is therefore modified and we now hold no error prejudicial to appellant’s rights was committed by the court’s ruling…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. County of Musselshell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Radermacher v. RadermacherIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Goldsborough v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Connolly v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of KaufmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Radermacher v. RadermacherIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Felton v. PratherIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Baker v. BROOKMEAD DAIRY, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Radermacher v. DanielsIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API