State Ex Rel. Goldsborough v. Huston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original Proceeding in Mandamus. \ Action by the State, on the relation of W. H. Goldsborough, against A. H. Huston, Judge of the District Court, Kingfisher County.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.
In Goldsborough et al. v. Hewitt, 23 Okla. 66, 99 Pac. 907, this court held the deed from Wm. H. Golds-borough to Robert Hewitt, dated February 18, 1897, to the home stead in controversy without consideration and void; that Louise Caldwell, the divorced wile of Goldsborough, had no interest therein; and reversed and remanded the cause. On the coming down of the mandate the trial court spread the same of record, but refused to proceed further, it appearing that, pending said cause in this court and between the date of its submission and decision, to wit, on August 13, 1908, the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hinckley v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
3Cited by19 opinions
- Berland's Inc. of Tulsa v. Northside Village Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Chronic Pain Associates, Inc. v. BubenikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Harper v. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Wolcott v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.