Legal Opinion

Lundstrum v. Lyng

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1991No. 89-1372PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

954 F.2d 1142

Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,425

Douglas D. LUNDSTRUM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Richard LYNG, Individually and in his capacity as Secretary

of the United States Department of Agriculture; Calvin

Lutz, Individually and in his capacity as Acting Director

for Michigan; Russell Keech, Individually and in his

capacity as District Supervisor; David W. Steeby,

Individually and in his capacity as County Supervisor;

Farmers Home Administration, a division of the United States

Department of Agriculture; and United States of America,

jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-1372.

United States Court of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kelly Copen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Paul Abbott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. Tornichio v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  4. Figueroa v. U.S. Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  5. Pryor Oil Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API