State v. . Whitaker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The question whether violation of Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the challenged statute constitutes a criminal offense was raised in S. v. Bishop, post, 371, and affirmatively answered. To this we refer.
In so far as tbe same question is raised in this ease, it may be, on the same reasoning similarly answered.
We note that appellants’ brief abandons assignments of error No. 1, (E. pp. 4 & 30) and No. 2 (E. pp. 14 & 30) relating to the sufficiency of the warrant to state the charge and the sufficiency of the evidence to convict, if the statute is declaratory of a criminal offense, except' that they…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lincoln Federal Labor Union v. Northwestern Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
- McNeill v. Harnett CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.