Legal Opinion

State v. Lockamy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 834SC19PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted under G.S. 20-138(b), which makes it a crime to operate a vehicle when the amount of alcohol in the blood is .10 percent or more by weight. Defendant now contends that nothing in the Record shows that his blood alcohol level was measured by weight.

The trial judge instructed the jury that the results from the breathalyzer indicated that the amount of alcohol in defendant’s blood was ten one hundredths of one percent by weight. Defendant contends that this instruction was unsupported by the evidence and that the charge against him should be dismissed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. KarchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. KarchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API