Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Karch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1986No. 02565Published

1Dissent

*233SPAETH, President Judge,

dissenting:*

The principal issue on this appeal is whether the admission of a hospital record containing the results of a chemical analysis of appellant’s blood for its alcohol content violated appellant’s right to confrontation. In combination, Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 100 S.Ct. 2531, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980), and Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970), hold that where a hearsay statement is important evidence and cross-examination of the declarant is not “wholly unreal,” the Confrontation Clause requires the prosecution to prove the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API