Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1976No. 55PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Upon the call of this case defendant and his witnesses were present and ready for trial. The prosecuting witness had not been notified the case was calendared for trial that day and was not in court. The trial court issued an instanter subpoena to require her presence. She was brought into court and the trial proceeded. At the end of the first day of the trial, defense witness Willie Lee Mackie was on the witness stand and had been examined and cross-examined. The court recessed for the day, and when it reconvened at 9 :80 a.m. the following morning, Mackie was not present.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. FincherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API