Legal Opinion
Di Melia v. Bowles
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 21, 1944No. 3100PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this complaint seeking a permanent injunction against the respondents restraining the latter from enforcing an order issued by the Chief Hearing Commissioner for the Office of Price Administration for Region No. 1, dated June 15, 1944, and affirmed on appeal by the Hearing Administrator for the Office of Price Administration at Washington, D. C., suspending the plaintiff’s right to deal in rationed gasoline “so long as gasoline shall be rationed.” Jurisdiction is invoked under the provisions of Section 205 (g) of the Emergency Price Control Act of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fink v. Continental Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Alabaugh v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954
- General Motors Corp. v. Miller Buick, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- United States v. One 1962 Ford Galaxie Sedan MotorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.