Legal Opinion
L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1944No. 793PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Sec. 2 (a) (2) of Title III of the Second War Powers Act (56 Stat. 178,50 U. S. C. App. (Supp. Ill), § 633) provides in part:
“Whenever the President is satisfied that the fulfillment of requirements for the defense of the United States will result in a shortage in the supply of any material or of any facilities for defense or for private account or for export, the President may allocate such material or facilities in such manner, upon such conditions and to such extent as he shall deem necessary or appropriate in the public interest and to promote the national defense.”
By § 2 (a) (8) of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Keppel v. Tiffin Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Junta Reglamentadora de TelecomunicacionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2000
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.