Legal Opinion
Alabaugh v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 29, 1954No. Civ. A. 7780PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss the complaint in this case raises the question whether the court has jurisdiction over the subject matter, or whether exclusive primary jurisdiction is in the National Railroad Adjustment Board.
Defendant Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (Brotherhood) entered into a union shop agreement with defendant Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (B & 0), effective November 1, 1951. Plaintiffs, locomotive engineers employed by B & 0, were members of Brotherhood until August, 1952, when they terminated their membership, stopped paying dues, and joined…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J. R. Alabaugh v. The Baltimore And Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Paul A.. Pigott v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Shiels v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1957
- Hostetler v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Rychlik v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.