Legal Opinion

W. H. Hobbs Supply Co. v. Ernst

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

The substance of the findings is as follows: For some time prior to July 1, 1953, defendant, David Ernst, had been in the employ of one Vern Dale, the operator of a business known as Outer’s Laboratories near Onalaska, Wisconsin. As a side line he did some repairing, altering, and remodeling of sporting goods in a small store in the city of Onalaska. The plaintiff, W. H. Hobbs Supply Company, a corporation, was engaged in the business of the sale, among other things, of sporting goods, particularly guns, ammunition, and related items. On or about July 1, 1953, the defendant stopped at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larson v. SplettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Acme Chair & Metal Crafts Co. v. Northern Corrugating Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Plantikow v. WolkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Cary Manufacturing Co. v. PommerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Weber v. MyhreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bank of Sun Prairie v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Williams v. Rank & Son Buick, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. First National Bank in Oshkosh v. ScieszinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. K&S Tool & Die Corp. v. Perfection MacHinery Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Hoekstra v. Guardian Pipeline, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API