First National Bank in Oshkosh v. Scieszinski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are presented on this appeal. They-are:
1. Is the court’s finding that the appellants conspired to defraud respondents against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence ?
2. Was the action against Streuly for fraud barred by his discharge in bankruptcy ?
3. Did respondents pursue all available remedies to mitigate damages ?
Conspiracy to Defraud.
A party alleging fraud has the burden of proving it by clear and convincing evidence.1 The elements of fraud are well established:
*573“ ‘To be actionable the false representation must consist, first, of a statement of fact which is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jacobsen v. WhitelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Household Finance Corp. v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Larson v. SplettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Neas v. SiemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Heal v. StollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- John Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Goerke v. VojvodichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.