Legal Opinion

First National Bank in Oshkosh v. Scieszinski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal. They-are:

1. Is the court’s finding that the appellants conspired to defraud respondents against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence ?

2. Was the action against Streuly for fraud barred by his discharge in bankruptcy ?

3. Did respondents pursue all available remedies to mitigate damages ?

Conspiracy to Defraud.

A party alleging fraud has the burden of proving it by clear and convincing evidence.1 The elements of fraud are well established:

*573“ ‘To be actionable the false representation must consist, first, of a statement of fact which is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. WhitelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Household Finance Corp. v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Larson v. SplettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Neas v. SiemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Heal v. StollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. John Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Goerke v. VojvodichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API