Legal Opinion
Hoekstra v. Guardian Pipeline, LLC
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 30, 2006No. 2003AP2809, 2004AP445, 2004AP828PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.
¶ 1. This is a consolidated appeal of three separate actions brought under Wis. Stat. ch. 32 (2003-04), Wisconsin's eminent domain chapter. Theresa Hoekstra, the Julie Sitor Living Trust and the Borchardt Loving Trust (collectively, the Landowners) appeal from three separate judgments and orders 2 arising from condemnation proceedings in which Guardian Pipeline, LLC condemned portions of the Landowners' properties to obtain an easement for a natural gas transmission pipeline.
¶ 2. In this appeal we address four issues. The first issue is whether evidence of comparable sales in a condemnation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- State v. WalstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Weeden v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 118th Street Kenosha, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Barlow Ranch, Limited Partnership v. Greencore Pipeline Company LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Brenner v. New Richmond Regional Airport CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.