State v. Baker (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 28} The majority opinion restates our prior holdings on substantial compliance with regulations regarding the proper handling of bodily substances and the burden-shifting test used to govern the admissibility of blood-alcohol test results. There is, for all intents and purposes, a court-made rule that a failure to refrigerate a specimen for four to five hours is a de minimis error. Although the majority correctly states case law, I believe that this is an opportunity to focus on the shortcomings of Ohio Adm.Code 3701-53-05(F), the director of health’s regulation that gives rise to this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. MaylOhio Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.