Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Baker (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2016No. 2014-1295Published

1ConcurrenceO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 28} The majority opinion restates our prior holdings on substantial compliance with regulations regarding the proper handling of bodily substances and the burden-shifting test used to govern the admissibility of blood-alcohol test results. There is, for all intents and purposes, a court-made rule that a failure to refrigerate a specimen for four to five hours is a de minimis error. Although the majority correctly states case law, I believe that this is an opportunity to focus on the shortcomings of Ohio Adm.Code 3701-53-05(F), the director of health’s regulation that gives rise to this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MaylOhio Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API