Legal Opinion

State v. Mayl

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2005No. 2003-1973PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we address the admissibility of a hospital blood-alcohol test in an aggravated-vehicular-homicide prosecution. John Mayl was charged with causing the death of another as a result of driving under the influence of alcohol. He filed a motion to suppress the results of the blood-alcohol test taken while he was being treated at the hospital after the accident. The trial court denied the motion because it found that the state need not show substantial compliance with Ohio Department of Health (“ODH”) regulations, since Mayl was not charged with a DUI offense. But the court of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SmorgalaOhio Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. HasslerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API