Russell v. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, C.
The appellee sued the appellant, the complaint being in two paragraphs. The first paragraph alleged, in substance, that the appellee and the appellant had been partners in the business of booksellers and stationers in the city of New Albany; that said copartnership was dissolved by mutual consent on the 1st of January, 1877; that at the time of said dissolution, and thereafter, disputes arose between said parties as to the rights and duties and respective obligations of said members of said late firm; that, for the purpose of settling the business of said eo-partnci’ship amicably and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Karthaus v. Yllas Y FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Underhill v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Flatter v. McDermittIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Goodwine v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Moore v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- McQuaid Market House Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Myers v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Hatfield v. HigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Fargo v. ReighardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895