Legal Opinion

Pelletier v. Goodnoff

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 27, 1998No. File 96-077959SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArena, J.

On March 28, 1995, the defendants, Bella Goodnoff and Andrea Goodnoff, entered into a contract to purchase real estate from the plaintiffs, Raymond Pelletier and Maureen Pelletier. Pursuant to the contract, the defendants placed $19,250 in escrow as a deposit. The purchase and sale agreement contained a mortgage contingency clause under which the agreement would be terminated and the deposit returned to the defendants if they were unable to obtain financing with reasonable efforts and due diligence. The original agreement gave the defendants until June 6, 1995, to obtain financing. The date…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  4. Cato v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Cato v. CatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pelletier v. GoodnoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Stover v. Fightlin, No. Cv 00 092410 (Mar. 8, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
  3. Tremblay v. Costa, No. 058736 (May 29, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API