Legal Opinion

Pelletier v. Goodnoff

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 23, 1999No. AC 18335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to open a judgment that was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to open. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Examination of the record discloses the following relevant facts. The plaintiffs live in Connecticut and the defendants live in New York. The parties entered into a purchase and sale agreement regarding a house in East Haddam. The defendants claimed that, despite their good faith efforts,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Celanese Fiber v. Pic Yarns, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. In re Karrlo K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Pelletier v. GoodnoffConnecticut Superior Court · 1998

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Warden, No. Cv98-0002714 (Apr. 27, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  2. Stover v. Fightlin, No. Cv 00 092410 (Mar. 8, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
  3. Tremblay v. Costa, No. 058736 (May 29, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API