Legal Opinion

Mataya v. Behm Motors, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 25, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-C-407PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (“the Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1901 — 1991. Before the Court are motions by the plaintiff and certain defendants, as are described more fully herein.

Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1989 which reads as follows:

“(a) Any person who, with intent to defraud, violates any requirement imposed under this subchapter shall be liable in an amount equal to the sum of—
“(1) three times the amount of actual damages sustained or $1,500, whichever is the greater; and
“(2)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stier v. Park Pontiac, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1975

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Irvin B. Alley v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  5. Majcher v. Laurel Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API