Legal Opinion

Schowgurow v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 11, 1965No. [No. 368, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oppenheimer, J.,

delivered the majority opinion of the Court. HornEy, J., dissents. Dissenting opinion at page 137, infra.

In this appeal by a Buddhist from a conviction of murder, we are confronted with the question of whether the provision of Article 36 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights that no person shall be deemed incompetent as a juror on account of religious belief “provided he believes in the existence of God” has been rendered unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment by the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

I

In Torcaso v. Watkins, 223 Md. 49, 162 A. 2d 438…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. John A. Spinkellink, 1 v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API