Legal Opinion
Allen v. PetSmart, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 4, 2007No. Civil Action 05-6760PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kevin Allen claims that his former employer, PetSmart, Inc, violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. §§ 951-963, by terminating his employment. Allen claims that Ms termination was unlawful because it was based on his age. PetSmart has filed a motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 10), which, for the following reasons, the Court will grant.
I. BACKGROUND
The salient and largely undisputed facts of this case are as follows. Mr. Allen began…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prewitt v. Walgreens Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Sullivan v. Nationwide Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Moreland v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018