Legal Opinion
Prewitt v. Walgreens Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 19, 2015No. Civil Action No. 11-02393PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
STENGEL, District Judge.
Rodney Prewitt was employed as a pharmacist at Walgreens. He was demoted and then terminated after voicing a moral objection to vaccinating customers. He claims Walgreens discriminated and retaliated against him because of his age. Walgreens now moves for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, I will grant this motion and enter judgment in favor of Walgreens.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 21, 2006, Rodney Prewitt was hired by Walgreens as a full-time salaried pharmacist.1 He was 57 at that time.2 He *295was assigned to work at the Walgreens store in Oxford,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deborah Gambill, Suprena Hawkins, Nena Hudson-Estrella, Royal Johnson, Veronica McCallum, Deasia Moore, Milton Ortiz, Martha Tate, and Garry Williams v. Child Development Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- French v. Albany Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- JEFFERY v. ERIE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- MASSETTI v. CREE, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- RUDOLF v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.