Legal Opinion
Goodworth Holdings Inc. v. Suh
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 20, 2002No. C 01-03130 WHAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff alleges that defendant Suh breached an oral joint-venture agreement by misappropriating the alleged venture’s opportunity while telling plaintiff that the opportunity had gone sour. ' On summary judgment, this order holds that although plaintiff and Dr. Suh conducted preliminary negotiations regarding a joint venture, they never created a binding contract. No reasonable jury could find otherwise. Plaintiffs fraud and state securities claims…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prostar Wireless Grp., LLC v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Xpertuniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Goodworth Holdings, Inc. v. SuhCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Brandt v. nVidia Corp. (In Re 3dfx Interactive, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Brandt v. nVidia Corp. (In re 3dfx Interactive, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.