Legal Opinion
White Oak Corp. v. Department of Consumer Protection
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 8, 1987No. 5542PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant is appealing from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs administrative appeal.
*252The plaintiff, White Oak Corporation, had contracted with the city of Stamford to perform certain construction work for the city in the downtown area. Under the terms of the contract, the plaintiff was to expand existing intersections, create new intersections and install or improve traffic signals at these intersections. In order for the plaintiff to accomplish the last of these tasks, electrical conduits were laid by the plaintiffs crew of general laborers.1 These laborers were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Norwich Land Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Derby Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Chute v. Mobil Shipping & Transportation Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. One 1981 BMW AutomobileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. HudsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Hartford Hospital v. Department of Consumer ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.