Legal Opinion
Hartford Hospital v. Department of Consumer Protection
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 3, 1998No. SC 15753PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether hospital employees who perform plumbing work for the hospital are exempt from the licensure requirements of chapter 393 of the General Statutes, § 20-330 et seq.2 We conclude that they are not exempt.
The following facts and procedural history are undisputed. On October 7,1994, the defendant plumbing and piping work board (board)3 issued complaints against the plaintiffs, Hartford Hospital (hospital) and Herve Gelinas, Charles Rowe and Arnrit Kalicharen, three of the hospital’s employees.4 Specifically, the board *711alleged that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SandovalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Felician Sisters of St. Francis of Connecticut, Inc. v. Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Connelly v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Kuehl v. Z-Loda System Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Beale v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.