SEARCH WARRANTS C-419847 & C-419848 v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.
This is the second opinion issued by this court involving petitioners’ case. In our previous opinion we ruled that a motion pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3922 for the return of property seized under a search warrant is a civil proceeding governed by the law of civil appeals. Greehling v. State, Ariz., 662 P.2d 1005 (1982). We retained jurisdiction of the appeal to decide the merits of the case. For a recitation of the facts, see Greehling v. State, supra.
The issues raised by this appeal are:
1. Who has the burden of proof under the contravention and restoration of property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Greehling v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Mehrens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. ReynaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Rodriguez v. ArellanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.