Legal Opinion

State v. Crowley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 22, 2002No. 2 CA-CR 01-0162PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellee Robert Orbry Crowley was charged with possession of a narcotic drug for sale, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Based primarily on State v. Berge, 130 Ariz. 135, 634 P.2d 947 (1981), the trial court granted Crowley’s motion to suppress evidence that had been seized from Crowley’s home, finding invalid the warrant that had authorized the search. The state dismissed the case and filed this appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4032. Challenging the trial court’s order granting Crowley’s motion to suppress, the state contends…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Don Jacob HavatoneArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. State v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond FikesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay KambitschCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API