Legal Opinion
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jerry E. Wells and Kenneth R. Steele, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1997No. 93-3924, 93-3932 and 94-1031PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMelloy, Chief District Judge
I
This matter is before the court pursuant to remand from the United States Supreme Court.
In United States v. Wells, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 921, 137 L.Ed.2d 107 (1997), the Supreme Court held that materiality is not an element of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which makes it a crime to knowingly make a false statement for the purpose of influencing the actions of a federally insured bank. The Supreme Court vacated this Court’s decision in United States v. Wells, 63 F.3d 745 (8th Cir.1995), which had held that materiality was an element of § 1014, and remanded the case for consideration of the remaining issues…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Dustin Lee Honken, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Dennis Joseph HadashCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David Staples, Also Known as Andrew N. BlattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Stephen Erhart, Also Known as Stephen Anthony ErhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Pamela Kuenstler, United States of America v. Gregory A. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.