Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. City of Huntingburgh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1924No. Nos. 11,830, 11,904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

The above-entitled causes, Nos. 11,830 and 11,904, except in a singular particular hereinafter noted, involve the same questions of law arising from the same state of facts. On a joint petition of all the parties, the oral arguments requested therein were heard jointly, and the two causes are now consolidated for determination on appeal. The appellants are the owners of real estate in the city of Huntingburgh, Indiana, against which assessments have been made to pay the cost of a sewer system constructed therein. The appellees in each of said causes are the same, being said city, its mayor,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. LaRoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Paine Lumber Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Edwards v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brumfield, Tr. v. State Ex Rel. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other StreetsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Prott v. City of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Schmueser v. CopelinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Bancroft v. Town of ChestertonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API