State, Ex Rel. Slovak v. Holod
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSherick, P. J.
The defendant, appellant herein, was twice tried and found by a jury to be the putative father of a child born to the prosecuting witness. A motion for a new trial in the first instance was sustained because of an insufficiency in the charge of the court, and the verdict returned was against the weight of the evidence. Upon retrial and upon the same evidence a like verdict was returned. Judgment was entered thereon, from which the defendant appeals to this court. Eighteen matters are complained of. Many of the claimed errors are not pressed in brief or oral argument, and are considered as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Walker v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Commonwealth v. D'AvellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Clark v. RysedorphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Ross v. MarxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.