Legal Opinion

State v. Damm

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1933No. File No. 7390PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendant, Clement Damm, and his wife intermarried in 1913. No children have been born of said marriage, but in 1925, while residing in Iowa, Damm and his wife adopted twin girls, Ruby and Ruth Wilson, then approximately seven years of age. The family removed' to Sioux Falls, S. D., in April, 1929, where they continued to reside. In May, 1931, it was discovered that Ruby, one of the adopted girls, was pregnant, and shortly thereafter defendant was arrested upon a charge of second degree rape. Ruby gave birth to a normal, full-term, female child on September 25, 1931. Shortly thereafter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Commonwealth v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Reagan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  4. State v. CallahanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. State v. RobySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API