Legal Opinion

Bush v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 13, 1958No. Civ. No. 0568PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the Motion For Production and Inspection of Documents of defendant, under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. (filing Number 6). Specifically, the defendant requests production of copies of plaintiff’s income tax returns for the years 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956 and 1957 for copying or photographing.

The Motion is supported by the affidavit of one of defendant’s attorneys relating to the materiality of the evidence.

The suit is one for negligence praying judgment for $354,000. It is claimed that by reason of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Karlsson v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Schriock v. SchriockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Cooper v. Hallgarten & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. Shaver v. Yacht Outward BoundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  5. Taylor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API