Legal Opinion
Rosamond v. Pennaco Hosiery, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided October 2, 1996No. Civ. A. 3:95CV124-D-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of the defendant Pennaco Hosiery, Inc. (“Pen-naco”) for the entry of summary judgment on its behalf with regard to the plaintiffs claims at bar.- Finding the motion only partially well taken, the court shall grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part.
I. Factual Background
The defendant Pennaco Hosiery, Inc. (“Pennaco”) hired the plaintiff as an employee on or about September 19, 1991. She worked at Pennaco’s Grenada, Mississippi plant where she worked most recently as an “auto gusset operator,” a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aurelio v. Rhode Island Department of AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
- Howell v. Operations Management International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Price v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Boren v. Wolverine Tube, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.