Legal Opinion

United States v. Green

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 4, 2004No. CRIM.02-10301-NGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: BIFURCATION

GERTNER, District Judge.

On July 7, 2004,1 issued a Memorandum and Order Re: Severance/Bifurcation of Guilt and Punishment. See United States v. Green, 324 F.Supp.2d 311 (D.Mass. 2004). I noted that it was an open question as to whether the Court, sitting on a federal death penalty-eligible case (under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3591-3593), was obliged to impanel a single jury charged with determining both guilt and, if necessary, punishment, and death-qualify that group before either proceeding began. I proposed two methods to address the question, and called for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Donnell YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. United States v. YoungDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API