United States v. Green
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: BIFURCATION
GERTNER, District Judge.
On July 7, 2004,1 issued a Memorandum and Order Re: Severance/Bifurcation of Guilt and Punishment. See United States v. Green, 324 F.Supp.2d 311 (D.Mass. 2004). I noted that it was an open question as to whether the Court, sitting on a federal death penalty-eligible case (under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3591-3593), was obliged to impanel a single jury charged with determining both guilt and, if necessary, punishment, and death-qualify that group before either proceeding began. I proposed two methods to address the question, and called for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Donnell YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- United States v. YoungDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.