Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rostad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 1991PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The defendant is under indictment for several drug offenses. She moved to suppress drugs, taken from her handbag by a police officer at the Belchertown police station without a warrant, and drugs and drug-related equipment subsequently taken from her automobile by a State trooper pursuant to a search warrant. After an evidentiary hearing, a judge of the Superior Court denied the motion to suppress. A single justice of this court allowed the defendant’s application for interlocutory appeal. We now reverse the order denying the defendant’s motion.

*619The motion judge recited his findings and legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. AlvaradoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. OliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. MuckleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API