Legal Opinion

People v. Beatty

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1942No. Crim. No. 3606PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and from two judgments of conviction for violation of sections 288 and 288a of the Penal Code. The sole ground of appeal is the insufficiency of the evidence.

The facts established by the witnesses for the prosecution are as follows: On September 21, 1941, one William Buck-ham, accompanied by his wife and two little girls, and defendant and his two children, visited Elysian Park for a picnic. Before departing for the park both Buckham and defendant imbibed two cans of beer. Upon their arrival at their destination they found it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People v. StouterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. GrinnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. City of Los Angeles v. ForresterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API