People v. Stouter
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County and from an order denying a new trial. William S. Wells, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The defendant was charged with the offense defined in section 288 of the Penal Code,—namely, thp commission of a lewd or lascivious act upon or with the body “of a child under the age of fourteen years, with intent," etc. He was convicted of an attempt to commit such offense, and was sentenced to fourteen years’ imprisonment in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
This crime belongs to that class of offenses of which it has been often said that the charge is easy to make and hard to disprove. In such cases jurors are sometimes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. PurcellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Rush v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.