Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Forrester
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1936No. Civ. 9955PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the trial court denying a motion after judgment for an order directing issuance of a writ of possession.
March 24, 1914, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff quieting its title to certain land located in Elysian Park, Los Angeles, California, then occupied by defendants. In 1919, 1920, 1926 and 1927 plaintiff obtained orders directing the issuance of writs of possession. Pursuant to these orders two writs were issued and returned unexecuted and two were never issued.
In 1931 an ex parte application for an order directing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.